Reading the actually paper I was disappointed with the approach but thats only because I read the article first. This is editorialised to the point it makes the paper look awful which it isn't.
The gender mental health gap isn't proven or even studied in the paper. This is an important and nuanced subject stripped of all understanding by the article.
After 250 generations of designing social structures to protect women and children, it’s good to see the west finally focusing on the mental health of teenage girls.
Reading the actually paper I was disappointed with the approach but thats only because I read the article first. This is editorialised to the point it makes the paper look awful which it isn't.
The gender mental health gap isn't proven or even studied in the paper. This is an important and nuanced subject stripped of all understanding by the article.
Interesting approach. Qualitative model, developed in collaboration (well, conjunction) with young women. Then applied quantitatively.
After 250 generations of designing social structures to protect women and children, it’s good to see the west finally focusing on the mental health of teenage girls.